Proofs of Twin Towers' Demolition Lead to 'Nanometals' for 'Superthermite', mRNA 'vaccines' and 'wildfires' ... and a Call for Full 'DISCLOSURE' and 'DISCUSSION' of What Researchers Can Tell Humanity
Nanormetals for Destruction of World Trade Buildings on 9/11/01, Too?
In 2002 the final section of my book, “ ‘9/11/01’ “ / Facing Our Fascist State looked back to the book’s originating intentions.
Here we go, then, from F O F S, as it’s reprinted in 2008’s book-of-two-books-and more, The World Is Turning: ‘ ‘9/11’ “, the Movement for Justice, and Reclaiming American for the World. It’s a little complicated, I know, but page 127 of The World Is Turning [ … ] starts the review of the originating intentions for F O F S
Reviewing the Case
‘We began with “ ‘9/11’ “.
We supposed that investigating the terrible crimes against humanity of 9/11/01 might expose the greater realities and greater forces which ordinary, intelligent and compassionate people now have to face.
We’ve seen, I believe, that the stories told about “ ‘9/11’ ” by Government officials and Corporate media--together, our effectual Corporate Government--can’t be true.
We’ve established, I hope, the undeniable proofs for the three defining facts that I put forth at the outset of this short book.
FACT #1) The airliners COULD NOT have struck their targets last September 11 unless multiple arms of the U.S. Government engaged in an unprecedented failure to carry out their mission to intercept off-course airliners.
FACT #2) American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757-200, COULD NOT have been flown by the Arab who is supposed to have piloted it.
FACT #3) And the World Trade Center’s 110-story Twin Towers and 47-story Building 7 COULD NOT have fallen as they did unless they were demolished by explosives set off within their structures.’
Six years later, 2008, I wanted the two-books-and-more of The World Is Turning [ … ] to include ‘A Brief Guide' to Proofs that the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers fell due to Controlled Demolition. Many researchers had presented by then a “tree-mendous” body of pictorial and deductive evidence that might be distilled toward understanding big particulars of what Jim Hoffman had come to call “the core of the crimes” in Lower Manhattan on 9/11/01. And so, on page 277 of The World Is Turning (available as WHOLE PDF on the Ur1Light.com site) , we have.
We proceed with the Guide that I hope will be valuable in July 2024, augmenting it with illustrations from Jim Hoffman’s and my 2004 book, Waking Up from Our Nightmare. The early 21st-century Psy-Op of “ ‘9/11’ “ seeded our suffering the Psy-Op of “ ‘COVID-19’ “ over the past four years. Thus I think that “ ‘9/11’ “ deserves the most complete exposure and understanding possible.
THE TOWERS' STRUCTURES AND MASSES
One BILLION pounds of structural steel and concrete made up each 110-story Twin Tower. More than 200,000 TONs of each lay its Columns, Beams, and Pans of structural steel. The Photo above is from page 29 Jim Hoffman’s and my illustrated book of 2004, Waking Up from Our Nightmare, available whole under the BOOKS tab at Ur1LIght.com.
Let's consider, first, the sheer size of the Twin Towers and the strength of their structures.
The North Tower (World Trade Center Building 1) and the South Tower (WTC Building 2) were 1362 feet and 1368 feet tall respectively. Each Tower weighed about one billion pounds (485,000 to 500,000 tons). Over 200,000 tons of each Tower's weight was made up of steel columns, I-beams, H-beams, trusses and pans. Over 100,000 tons of each 110-story Tower was made up of concrete floor slabs.
Each Tower had four outer walls 207 feet wide. Each had core structures that measured 87 feet by 135 feet. Within each's Tower's core structure were 47 central columns of structural steel. The radial dimensions of these core columns ranged from 52" by 22" (more than four feet wide) to 36" by 22". The core columns' steel was 5"-thick at their base and tapered to 1/4" when they transitioned into H-beams about 1000 feet (the 92nd floor) above street-level in Lower Manhattan. Each Tower also had 236 perimeter columns, measuring 13.5" by 14", for additional support.
The floors of each Tower's 87' by 135' core-structure were framed by structural steel I-beams two to three feet high (or "deep"). Extending outward from the core-structure to each Tower's four 209' exterior walls were corrugated steel pans, supported by primary double trusses and secondary transverse trusses. The primary trusses were about three feet (900 millimeters) high or deep. Each floor was overlain by about four inches (10 centimeters) of concrete slab in at least its diaphragm The concrete, decking and trusses were integrated structures, more than three feet thick for each floor.
Virtually all of the above-specified mass in each Tower somehow blew into clouds of gritty dust, or became huge horizontal projectiles, or dropped straight to ground in less than 15 seconds, on September 11, 2001.
The Internet pages below offer visual and analytic information about the Towers' structures. First, http://911research.com/wtc/evidence/plans/index.html Second, http://911research.com/wtc/arch/core.html http://www.ae911truth.org/twintowers.php
Blueprint of the North Tower's 50th floor shows the continuing strength of its 47 central steel columns, as does the photo above.
EXPLOSIVENESS
Destruction of each Tower began suddenly in and above the impact-zones of American Airlines 11 (which struck the North Tower, WTC Building 1, between floors 94 and 98 at 8:46 a.m) and United Airlines 175 (which struck the South Tower between floors 78 and 84 at 9:03 a.m.)
Horizontal ejections of concrete and steel threw thousands of tons of matter sideways within the first five seconds of each Tower's fall.
Rippling downward from floor to floor—as if rent by belts of charges and yet spewing upward like a volcanic eruption—each Tower's collapse threw out clouds of smoky matter more than five times times the radius of each Tower's 836-foot diameter.
None of the above phenomena of explosiveness can be explained by jet fuel's or office equipment's fire, the airliners' impacts, or each Tower's potential gravitational energy.
The Internet pages below offer visual and analytic information that pertains to explosiveness of the Towers' destruction.
http://911research.com/wtc/analysis/collapses/shattering.html
[ … ]
PULVERIZATION
Videos show that massive ejections of fine particulates follow glimpses of boiling-red matter inside each Tower at the onset of each Tower's destruction. Ever-increasing clouds of dust then roll outward (steel columns somehow disappearing) and mushroom into pyroclastic forms several times wider than each Tower's diameter.
How could slabs of concrete be instantly blown into dust?
Again—
Jeff King, an electrical engineer and a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, stated in 2002: 'Remember that dust begins to appear in quantity in the very earliest stages of the collapses, when nothing is moving very fast relative to anything else in the structure. How then is reinforced concrete turned into dust and ejected laterally from the building at high speed?'
King and Jim Hoffman have also noted that one source of energy can't account for two simultaneous effects. U. S. Government explanations (FEMA, NIST) hold that the Towers' potential gravitational energy produced both the thorough pulverization of concrete and the near free-fall descent of the 110-story buildings. The truth, however, is that potential gravitational energy doesn't explain either one of these effects, much less both.
Only devices capable precise and spectacular EXPLOVISENESS, perhaps combining each others’ forces, can explain 4"-thick slabs of concrete blowing into 25-micron bits early in each Tower's collapse.
SPEED
Speed here refers to the rate of the Towers' descents.
A baseball--or an acre of concrete, the size of each floor of the Twin Towers--would have fallen from the top of each 110-story Tower to plaza-level of the World Trade Center in approximately 9.2 seconds if that baseball, or that acre of concrete, had dropped through nothing but air.
Each Tower's actual collapse on 9/11/01 was completed in a little less than 15 seconds, a speed close to free-fall.
Also, video footage shows each Tower's inward structure collapsing UPON itself and THROUGH itself as fast as rubble falls through the air by the 70th floor of each Tower's descent.
Please remember the 3-foot high I-beams that horizontally supported every floor of the Towers' core-structure. Remember, too, the 47 central columns, ranging from four feet to three feet in width, and the 235 perimeter columns of structural steel, each more than one foot in circumference, that were each Tower's main vertical supports.
We know that this huge lattice-work of steel supports should have drastically slowed and skewed each Towers’ Towers' fall.
SYMMETRY
'Oh, they fell so fast, they fell straight down ...
Fell like elevators erupting to the ground....'
Lines from the song “9/11 Is A Big Lie”.
Almost all of the steel masses of the South Tower and the North Tower fell about their vertical axes with near-perfect symmetry. Their supports gave way with a synchrony that kept them from toppling and causing much less predictable destruction.
Jim Hoffman elaborates: 'Getting buildings to fall vertically (i.e.: symmetrically about their vertical axes) is what the art and science of controlled demolition are all about.' He points out how such demolition is made to happen: the careful placement and timing of explosives 'cause the simultaneous and symmetric failures of all the main structural supports.' Regarding the Twin Towers in particular, he writes: 'It is inconceivable that any random event or combination of events, such as aircraft collisions, fires, or fuel tank explosions, could cause the simultaneous failure of all the support columns in a building--especially a tall steel-framed building-- needed to cause it to collapse vertically.'
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/symmetry.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/steel.html
FIRE CAN’T EXPLAIN THE EXPLOSIVENESS, PULVERIZATION, SPEED AND SYMMETRY OF THE TWIN TOWERS’ DESTRUCTION
Please see the two examples below, drawn from Jim’s and my Waking Up from Our Nightmare book, of high-rise steel-framed skyscrapers remaining intact despire many hours of internal firess fires far more intense than those experienced in either Twin Tower or in the that other piece of commercial real-estate, also owned by Silverstein Properties, the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7, which feel into its own footprint on 9/11/01.
The blackened smoke from the South Towers’ fire show its heat to be much diminished, as was reported by New York Fire Department Captains who expected to rescue civilians on this Tower’s 78th floor … instants before it, the second Tower hit, fell at 9:58 a.m., 56 minutes after impact, in an explosive, symmetric, mass-murderous ‘event’, never seen before 9/11/01 or since then.
Again—
And now to a quite deep, I think, “ ‘9/11’ “ and “ ‘COVID-19’ “ connection.
DOES NANOTECHNOLOGY THROUGH SUPERTHERMITE EXPLAIN THE UNPRECEDENTED DESTRUCTION OF THE TWIN TOWERS?
Another phenomenon of ‘Ground Zero’ for the 9/11/01 destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 that’s treated in my 2008 ‘Guide to Proofs [ … ] ‘ is examined under the heading ‘MOLTEN METAL’.
This section leads us to ‘nanotechnology’ and ‘superthermite’. Let me quote it at length.
MOLTEN METAL ‘Molten iron, iron so hot that it was liquid, burning at temperatures far higher than uncontrolled fire can produce, persisted at Ground Zero of the World Trade Center for months after 9/11/01, according to many officials and scientists who worked at the site. Such long-lasting molten iron can be explained by thermite or thermate explosives as its source.
Government Computer News of September 2002 reported: 'For six months after Sept. 11, the ground temperature varied between 600 degrees Fahrenheit and 1,500 degrees, sometimes higher.' G C N quoted Greg Fuchek, Vice-President of Sales for LinksPoint Inc. of Norwalk, Connecticut: ' “In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel,” Fuchek said.'
Alison Geyh, Ph.D, was quoted in the Johns Hopkins Public Health Magazine as to work at Ground Zero in late October 2001: ' "Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding molten steel." '
In 2005 Steven Jones, then Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University in Utah, began to publish papers that posited thermite as a plausible source of Ground Zero's molten iron.
Professor Jones wrote in 'Why Indeed Did the WTC Builidngs Completely Collapse?' of 2006: ... thermite reactions may well have resulted in substantial quantities (observed in pools) of molten iron at very high temperatures – initially above 2,000 °C (3,632 °F). At these temperatures, various materials entrained in the molten metal pools will continue to undergo exothermic reactions which would tend to keep the pools hot for weeks despite radiative and conductive losses.... Thus, molten metal was repeatedly observed and formally reported in the rubble piles of the WTC Towers and WTC 7, metal that looked like molten steel or perhaps iron. We maintain that these observations are consistent with the use of high-temperature cutter-charges such as thermite, HMX or RDX or some combination thereof, routinely used to melt/cut/demolish steel.'
Both Professor Jones and the National Institute of Standards and Technology's Report note that strange flows and glows of evidently molten metal in the northeast corner of the South Tower's 80th floor immediately precede that Tower's destruction.
Jones writes: 'An intriguing photograph found as Figure 9-44 in the NIST report provides evidence for a highly exothermic reaction at the corner of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse.' He quotes the NIST Report: ' "An unusual flame is visible within this fire. In the upper photograph {Fig 9-44} a very bright flame, as opposed to the typical yellow or orange surrounding flames, which is generating a plume of white smoke, stands out.' Jones proceeds with his quoting of the National Institute's findings: ' “NIST reported (NCSTAR 1-5A) that just before 9:52 a.m., a bright spot appeared at the top of a window on the 80th floor of WTC 2, four windows removed from the east edge on the north face, followed by the flow of a glowing liquid. This flow lasted approximately four seconds before subsiding. Many such liquid flows were observed from near this location in the seven minutes leading up to the collapse of this tower.” Source: http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm (August 2006) '.
[ … ]
One explanation for the extraordinary explosiveness seen throughout each Tower's destruction may be found in an article by John Gartner in Technology Review of January 21, 2005. The title of Gartner’s article is: 'Military Reloads with Nanotech'. Steven Jones' paper quotes Gartner, too.
Gartner's piece highlights 'superthermites'.
He writes: 'Researchers can greatly increase the power of weapons by adding materials known as superthermites that combine nanometals such as nanoaluminum with metal oxides such as iron oxide, according to Steven Son, a project leader in the Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos. "The advantage (of using nanometals) is in how fast you can get their energy out," Son says.... Son, who has been working on nanoenergetics for more than three years, says that scientists can engineer nanoaluminum powders with different particle sizes to vary the energy release rates. This enables the material to be used in many applications, including underwater explosive devices... However, researchers aren't permitted to discuss what practical military applications may come from this research." '
And so…. And now….
From what we know in July 2024 of the unprecedented, precise and unfathomably destructive ‘wildfires’ in Laihana, Maui, Hawaii and the ‘wildfires’ that ravaged towns in California and Oregon … and what we know of the lipid nanoparticles enabling the admitted ‘operating systems’ of mRNA ‘vaccines’ that have injured and killed millions under the pretext of ‘COVID-19’ … we may say that DEMANDING DISCLOSURE AND DISCUSSION of ‘what practical [ … ] applications’ may come’ from such research is our duty and right toward scientists such as Steven Son.
We may also say that DISCLOSURE AND DISCUSION is the duty of those scientists and the duty of Governments and Corporations that employ such scientists.
Freedom for life!